[fpc-devel] Corrected test and patch

[Peter Vreman]

Sergei Gorelkin wrote:
>
> Sergei Gorelkin wrote:
>>
>> I'll be digging further in.
>>
> Here goes. I modified the test so that it fails reliably, and patched
> the compiler so that is doesn't fail again.
> It was a bit tricky to get a string with refcount=1 without telling the
> compiler to take its address.
> As for the patch, I could not invent anything more clever than comparing
> the assignment target with all function parameters one by one. Also
> typeconversion nodes may have to be handled.
This patch is not good enough. Like you already say typeconversions are 
not handled. And what about subscriptions or dereferences. Minor remark 
is the name of the method which is too generic and not making explicit 
what it does.