[fpc-devel] what fpc is good for?
Luiz Americo Pereira Camara
pascalive at bol.com.br
Sun May 13 17:38:27 CEST 2007
Marco van de Voort wrote:
>> Dani?l Mantione wrote:
>>
>>> But I'll leave this up to the Lazarus team. They have talented developers,
>>> and I'm sure they are brainstorming about ideas to reduce the exe size.
>>> However, Lazarus developers do the engineering balancing too and weigh exe
>>> size against anything else.
>>>
>>>
>> Another idea is to avoid overlap of features like
>> - *CriticalSection functions vs SyncObjs
>>
>
> Delphi backwards compat.
>
>
Should not this be in fpc side ? (Is not gui related and cross-platform
widgetsets can have problems implementing it).
>> - TPairSplitter vs TSplitter
>>
>
> Lazarus internal (with previous versions) backwards compat
>
>
>> - TNoteBook vs TTabControl
>>
>
> Afaik Laz internal too.
>
>
>> of course this would be provided as packages for who needs
>>
>
> This kind of stuff is easily said, but in practice if you change it, some
> other compability or consistency camp starts complaining. There is a reason
> for nearly every construct.
>
>
Ok.
Luiz
More information about the fpc-devel
mailing list