[fpc-devel] what fpc is good for?

Luiz Americo Pereira Camara pascalive at bol.com.br
Sun May 13 17:38:27 CEST 2007


Marco van de Voort wrote:
>> Dani?l Mantione wrote:
>>     
>>> But I'll leave this up to the Lazarus team. They have talented developers, 
>>> and I'm sure they are brainstorming about ideas to reduce the exe size. 
>>> However, Lazarus developers do the engineering balancing too and weigh exe 
>>> size against anything else.
>>>   
>>>       
>> Another idea is to avoid overlap of features like
>>  - *CriticalSection functions vs SyncObjs
>>     
>
> Delphi backwards compat.
>
>   
Should not this be in fpc side ? (Is not gui related and cross-platform 
widgetsets can have problems implementing it).

>>  - TPairSplitter vs TSplitter
>>     
>
> Lazarus internal (with previous versions) backwards compat
>
>   
>>  - TNoteBook vs TTabControl
>>     
>
> Afaik Laz internal too.
>
>   
>> of course this would be provided as packages for who needs
>>     
>
> This kind of stuff is easily said, but in practice if you change it, some
> other compability or consistency camp starts complaining. There is a reason
> for nearly every construct.
>
>   
Ok.

Luiz



More information about the fpc-devel mailing list