[fpc-devel] Local procedures as procedural parameter

[olle.r at automagika.se]

>
> On 14 mrt 2005, at 10:51, Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
>
>>>> 2. I see no difference whatsoever between typ_fun and iso_fun, except
>>>>     the use of an extra type, which, in my opinion, does not change
>>>>     anything to the usage or code of these functions. If one is
>>>> allowed,
>>>>     the other should be allowed as well.
>>>
>>> No, and at present there is no difference in generated code.
>>
>> Which means that the above example IS a problem.
>
> Only because the compiler currently does not support ISO-style
> procvars. Olle changed it to accept the syntax (so it works in cases
> you do not access variables of a parent), but it generates code as if
> it's a regular procvar (which is indeed wrong). The latter is what
> Adriaan wants to fix.

The credits should go to Peter, who implemented it :-)

Olle