[fpc-devel] Local procedures as procedural parameter

[Jonas Maebe]

On 14 mrt 2005, at 10:51, Michael Van Canneyt wrote:

>>> 2. I see no difference whatsoever between typ_fun and iso_fun, except
>>>     the use of an extra type, which, in my opinion, does not change
>>>     anything to the usage or code of these functions. If one is 
>>> allowed,
>>>     the other should be allowed as well.
>>
>> No, and at present there is no difference in generated code.
>
> Which means that the above example IS a problem.

Only because the compiler currently does not support ISO-style 
procvars. Olle changed it to accept the syntax (so it works in cases 
you do not access variables of a parent), but it generates code as if 
it's a regular procvar (which is indeed wrong). The latter is what 
Adriaan wants to fix.


Jonas