[fpc-devel] Local procedures as procedural parameter

Jonas Maebe jonas at zeus.ugent.be
Mon Mar 14 11:00:35 CET 2005

On 14 mrt 2005, at 10:51, Michael Van Canneyt wrote:

>>> 2. I see no difference whatsoever between typ_fun and iso_fun, except
>>>     the use of an extra type, which, in my opinion, does not change
>>>     anything to the usage or code of these functions. If one is 
>>> allowed,
>>>     the other should be allowed as well.
>> No, and at present there is no difference in generated code.
> Which means that the above example IS a problem.

Only because the compiler currently does not support ISO-style 
procvars. Olle changed it to accept the syntax (so it works in cases 
you do not access variables of a parent), but it generates code as if 
it's a regular procvar (which is indeed wrong). The latter is what 
Adriaan wants to fix.


More information about the fpc-devel mailing list