[fpc-devel] Benchmark for FreePascal
Marc Weustink
marc.weustink at cuperus.nl
Wed Dec 14 18:33:41 CET 2005
Jonas Maebe wrote:
>
> On 10 dec 2005, at 22:09, darekM wrote:
>
>> I've see that reverse-complement benchmark <http://
>> shootout.alioth.debian.org/benchmark.php?test=revcomp&lang=all> for
>> FPC is very slow. I discover, that problem is with readln, that
>> function consume about 90% of time.
>
>
> In my test (Mac OS X/PPC, rtl and program compiled with register
> variables, text buffer of 64kb) readln's overheid is negligible. The
> large cost comes from writeln. The reason the C version is so much
> faster is because its output is buffered as well. We automatically
> flush the output after each writeln (i.e. after each writeln of 60
> characters), while in C this only happens at the very end of the
> program for 128kb of characters at a time.
Another speed improvement will be disabling IO checks for write, {$I-}
I normally wouldn't recomend doing so, but for this test it either
passes or fails.
Marc
More information about the fpc-devel
mailing list