[fpc-devel] inline and asm code

[Marco van de Voort]

> I found out that for operators which are declared to be inline and have asm code
> inside the inlining option is ignored (I assume the same would be true for
> procs/funcs).
> 
> Is that intentional? Does it have a reason? Would be great if that could be
> stopped.

Yes - needs complex parsing to determine if the asm is dangerous (e.g. EBP
usage) - enhanced support not expect anytime soon due to complexity