[fpc-pascal] fpc and intel vtune (now about gprof)

[Пётр Косаревский]

ON TOPIC:
maybe shipping with FPC cygwin runtime libraries for gprof wouldn't harm? Because:
       1. Some are shipped (for FP --- IDE)
       2. If I am right, libc, libgcc, libgmon and libkernel32 are needed, they shouldn't be weightier than some rarely used binary utils
       3. Full CYGWIN is not required (as I guess, MINGW is more appropriate [its rtl], isn't it?)
       4. -pg is a compiler option, not some external feature implying installation of something


BRANCH:
> > Bug number is 4929.
> a valid option. So my statement is still the same - could you be more
> specific what is wrong, please?
> Tomas

Well, it is not a bug.


I even submitted it as compatibility or something. I do call it a bug, because it was marked "Fixed", not "Not a bug".

BUT:
2.0.3 2006.4.20 does not emit warning, nor do I see one in compiler messages file. (Maybe you mean "still BUGGY maximum optimize", Ox? [don't mix with older comments about "still BUGGY!!!" register optimizations])

Sorry for inconveniences.