[fpc-pascal] Freeing memory with exceptions
Benito van der Zander
benito at benibela.de
Thu May 25 22:49:08 CEST 2023
Hi,
>
> That 99.99% of people does use it, indicates they simply take the
> overhead because
> of the advantages that the managed types offer.
Or they simply do not know about the overhead
Like I was writing all my code on Windows 98, and never noticed any
overhead, until I started running benchmarks on Linux.
Bye,
Benito
On 25.05.23 07:58, Michael Van Canneyt via fpc-pascal wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, 25 May 2023, Hairy Pixels via fpc-pascal wrote:
>
>>
>>
>>> On May 24, 2023, at 10:11 PM, Sven Barth via fpc-pascal
>>> <fpc-pascal at lists.freepascal.org> wrote:
>>>
>>> You must have $H+ on and those are AnsiStrings? Why is there
>>> exception handling involved with AnsiString? I guess it needs this
>>> just in case an exception is thrown somewhere in the call stack?
>>>
>>> Because Ansi- and UnicodeString are managed types. *All* managed
>>> types managed string types, interfaces, Variants, managed records)
>>> must be finalized correctly even if an exception occurs.
>>>
>>
>> That's a problem with exceptions then, they are baked into the language
>> and impose a cost on all managed types now even if we use them or
>> not. Even disabling the implicit stack frames (forgot what it's
>> called) doesn't
>> get around this right?
>
> Why do you insist it is a problem ?
>
> Simply don't use managed types and don't use exceptions if you don't
> like the
> overhead they cause. It's still perfectly possible: avoid the sysutils
> unit
> and you're all set. The system unit does not use exceptions.
>
> That 99.99% of people does use it, indicates they simply take the
> overhead because
> of the advantages that the managed types offer.
>
> Which is not to say that FPC should not strive to minimize the overhead.
> Conceivably there is some gain possible on non-windows platforms.
>
> Michael.
> _______________________________________________
> fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal at lists.freepascal.org
> https://lists.freepascal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.freepascal.org/pipermail/fpc-pascal/attachments/20230525/a6c12ac7/attachment.htm>
More information about the fpc-pascal
mailing list