[fpc-pascal] More syntax questions (part 3)

[Adriaan van Os]

Michael Van Canneyt via fpc-pascal wrote:

> This is not correct either, as it suggests that ( ... ) is correct. It 
> is not, if you use ... there must be other arguments present.

That is offending the reader: "You are to stupid to be given complete information".

It misses the point that programmers must be taught to think precise, abstract, conceptually and 
logically. For the same reason, modern math teaching doesn't work. It tries to circumvent abstract 
thinking by showing pictures. But there is no alternative to learning to think in abstract 
concepts. The more stupid education becomes, the less their pupils do learn 
<https://www.tagesschau.de/inland/gesellschaft/pisa-studie-128.html>.

If the language has the complexity built-in, there is no alternative but to be honest about it.

> You're also missing the ";" in front of the "...".

Thanks for pointing that out. I have added it.

Regards,

Adriaan van Os