[fpc-pascal] *.rst vs *.rsj
victor.campillo at gmail.com
Thu Mar 7 17:44:34 CET 2019
On 7/3/19 9:02, Luca Olivetti wrote:
> Beware, if you use bitpacked records or threading there are bugs in
> 3.0.4. I have to keep using 2.6.4 due to that.
> Apparently the 3.2 branch works fine in my case, but it's still
> Also the transition to codepage aware ansistrings, though not as
> terrible as I thought, it can still bite you.
I use bitpacked records in many of my projects because they are very
useful in PLC communications, can you elaborate about the issue on fpc
More information about the fpc-pascal