[fpc-pascal] precedence "is" and "and"

[Marco van de Voort]

Op 2018-12-08 om 20:38 schreef Mattias Gaertner via fpc-pascal:
> According to the docs, the "is" operator is fourth level, the "and" is
> second level, so the "and" must be computed before the "is". But it
> seems fpc treats "is" and "and" as same level:

logical (boolean) vs bitwise AND difference?