[fpc-pascal] Implicit generic specializations

[Ryan Joseph]

> On Dec 3, 2018, at 1:59 PM, Sven Barth via fpc-pascal <fpc-pascal at lists.freepascal.org> wrote:
> 
> The dummy symbol should only be created if there isn't an existing symbol with that name. So maybe something is buggy there. (Also the dummy symbol should be used for a non-generic routine if the order of declaration is the other way round)
> 

I just looked it over and I was wrong about the dummy, it’s just a flag. If the generic doesn’t cover existing functions then that messes up some assumptions I made so I need re-think the design now.

Regards,
	Ryan Joseph