[fpc-pascal] Implicit generic specializations

Ryan Joseph ryan at thealchemistguild.com
Mon Dec 3 08:45:18 CET 2018

> On Dec 3, 2018, at 1:59 PM, Sven Barth via fpc-pascal <fpc-pascal at lists.freepascal.org> wrote:
> The dummy symbol should only be created if there isn't an existing symbol with that name. So maybe something is buggy there. (Also the dummy symbol should be used for a non-generic routine if the order of declaration is the other way round)

I just looked it over and I was wrong about the dummy, it’s just a flag. If the generic doesn’t cover existing functions then that messes up some assumptions I made so I need re-think the design now.

	Ryan Joseph

More information about the fpc-pascal mailing list