[fpc-pascal] why can't we define class operator for old fashion object type, but ok for 'advanced record' type?

Bo Berglund bo.berglund at gmail.com
Sat Aug 18 07:52:09 CEST 2018

Previous message (by thread): [fpc-pascal] why can't we define class operator for old fashion object type, but ok for 'advanced record' type?
Next message (by thread): [fpc-pascal] why can't we define class operator for old fashion object type, but ok for 'advanced record' type?
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Sat, 18 Aug 2018 03:19:55 +0200, Sven Barth via fpc-pascal
<fpc-pascal at lists.freepascal.org> wrote:

>In Delphi objects are deprecated

Huh?
ObjectPascal deprecating objects?
Sounds far-fetched.


-- 
Bo Berglund
Developer in Sweden

Previous message (by thread): [fpc-pascal] why can't we define class operator for old fashion object type, but ok for 'advanced record' type?
Next message (by thread): [fpc-pascal] why can't we define class operator for old fashion object type, but ok for 'advanced record' type?
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

More information about the fpc-pascal mailing list