[fpc-pascal] named parameter

[Ryan Joseph]

> On May 27, 2017, at 4:27 PM, Graeme Geldenhuys <mailinglists at geldenhuys.co.uk> wrote:
> 
> Yeah, that was going to be my suggestion too. I've done this many times when many parameters are optional. Use a record as parameter type. The other benefit of this is that it is future and backwards compatible. You can add or change parameters without breaking the method signature.

can you show an example of this? Just curious.

Regards,
	Ryan Joseph