[fpc-pascal] FPC for AVR

[Mark Morgan Lloyd]

On 15/06/17 17:45, Bernd Mueller wrote:
> On 06/15/2017 10:34 AM, Mark Morgan Lloyd wrote:
>
>> Yes, but I was asking about the FPC situation. I'm desperately
>> resisting local pressure to write code that might end up non-trivial
>> in C/C++.
>
> I realized a project with an ATTiny1634. Nothing special: I used both
> UARTs (interrupt driven), had to handle a small shaft encoder and had to
> do a little bit banging on the GPIOs. All together, I used 6 Interrupts.
> For debugging, I implemented a third "soft-UART", which could send only.
>
> At any time, I could switch back to the pascal compiler, which I used
> over the last 17 years for AVR. But I am not going back, too much
> advantages on the fpc side to me :-)

Thanks for that, encouraging.

-- 
Mark Morgan Lloyd
markMLl .AT. telemetry.co .DOT. uk

[Opinions above are the author's, not those of his employers or colleagues]