[fpc-pascal] H2pas tool vs others, C header translation
Michael Van Canneyt
michael at freepascal.org
Sat Aug 26 12:57:44 CEST 2017
On Sat, 26 Aug 2017, Sven Barth wrote:
>>
>> Sorry for being naive. Why not simply use a boolean ?
>>
>> I thought all this BOOL mess was just meant to be able to interface with C
>> libs slightly easier.
>>
>> Instead of
>>
>> If (SomeCfunction()<>0) then
>> DoSomethingStupid;
>>
>> it allows you to write - in appropriate cases - the following:
>>
>> if (SomeCfunction()) then
>> DoSomethingStupid;
>>
>> I don't think we should promote BOOL and friends too much. They are a
> convenience (which IMHO should not have been introduced in the first place).
>>
>> Promoting them to first-class Pascal citizens is IMHO a bad idea.
>
> Did you read the article that had been linked? That's an important point
> that is raised in there.
I did read it.
I think the programmer *must* worry about the details and must definitely
NOT use the booleans for anything C related. That was my point.
Attempting to cater for C code using BOOL or whatever type is misplaced.
C does not have a boolean type.
The standard says for "if" :
"In both forms, the first substatement is executed if the expression compares unequal to 0."
Treat it as such.
Michael.
More information about the fpc-pascal
mailing list