[fpc-pascal] code example where AnsiString used in FCL (SqlDB) causes data loss

Jonas Maebe jonas.maebe at elis.ugent.be
Wed May 11 22:33:13 CEST 2016


Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
> On 2016-05-11 18:58, Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
>> >  For 99,99% of cases, no changes to your code are required.
>> >  If it worked in 2.6.4, it will work in 3.0.0
>
> Just curious, so why was there so many changes required for LCL, and a
> whole wiki page of its own to explain it?

Those changes were not required, (almost) everything worked still fine 
with the old code. They made the changes to take advantage of the new 
functionality in FPC 3.0, because the end result is much simpler code 
both in the LCL and in user programs.

The wiki page is mainly to explain all of the things you no longer have 
to do when using this new method.


Jonas



More information about the fpc-pascal mailing list