[fpc-pascal] CMem issue?

silvioprog silvioprog at gmail.com
Tue Mar 8 12:28:19 CET 2016

On Tue, Mar 8, 2016 at 4:02 AM, Sven Barth <pascaldragon at googlemail.com>

> *Always* put an alternate memory manager as the first unit. I think that
> requirement is even documented somewhere...
Thanks for share this information.

> Also don't use -gh with alternate memory managers. They are *both* memory
> managers and thus will lead to conflicting situations.
Hmmmm... I didn't know about this conflicting, thanks again! :-)

Is there some way to report possible memory leaks when my memory manager is
the cmem?

Now I omitted the -gh and declared the units as:

=== code ===

  cmem, Classes, SysUtils;

=== /code ===

And the problem was:

=== error ===

An unhandled exception occurred at $0040B8E2:
EAccessViolation: Access violation

=== /error ===

Silvio Cl├ęcio
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.freepascal.org/pipermail/fpc-pascal/attachments/20160308/35f8408e/attachment.html>

More information about the fpc-pascal mailing list