[fpc-pascal] Please someone explain this to me

Dmitry Boyarintsev skalogryz.lists at gmail.com
Wed Feb 10 21:35:01 CET 2016


On Wed, Feb 10, 2016 at 3:32 PM, Graeme Geldenhuys <
mailinglists at geldenhuys.co.uk> wrote:

> On 2016-02-10 19:20, Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
> > You just need to look at the system or sysutils units from recent
> delphis to
> > see why include files are the better option,
> As someone that doesn't have access to recent Delphi versions, would you
> mind sharing a small example if you can.
>

It would be odd if they're using includes heavily.

It feels like namespaces should've resolved the problem.
Thus includes are replaced by namespaces, since it **should** keep
unit-like code structure.

thanks,
Dmitry
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.freepascal.org/pipermail/fpc-pascal/attachments/20160210/30c4a3bc/attachment.html>


More information about the fpc-pascal mailing list