[fpc-pascal] New feature: IfThen() intrinsic
Sven Barth
pascaldragon at googlemail.com
Mon Feb 1 21:10:30 CET 2016
On 01.02.2016 21:02, silvioprog wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 1, 2016 at 4:47 PM, Sven Barth <pascaldragon at googlemail.com
> <mailto:pascaldragon at googlemail.com>> wrote:
>
> On 01.02.2016 20:33, Marcos Douglas wrote:
> > On Mon, Feb 1, 2016 at 5:06 PM, David Butler <djbutler at gmail.com
> <mailto:djbutler at gmail.com>> wrote:
> >> Speaking personally, the reason why I like Pascal syntax over C
> is exactly
> >> because it isn't short. I prefer the verbosity of Pascal rather than
> >> "cryptic" syntax of the C family. e.g. Pascal uses "function" not
> "func",
> >> "procedure" not "proc", "if then else" not "if ()", etc. Using
> short C-like
> >> syntax in Pascal goes against the long established style of Pascal.
> >
> > +1
> >
> > IMHO we can't use "IfThen" (or iif, IfThenElse, etc) as if it were a
> > real function, because it is not.
> >
> > So, according to the "spirit of Pascal, what do you think about this?
> >
> >
> > V := inline If Condition then ThenExpr else ElseExpr;
> >
> >
> > Only "inline" keyword will be introduced.
> > But I don't know if will be more hard to implement this.
>
> If we would go the route of such an if-expression instead of an
> intrinsic then just leave away the "inline". That's absolutely not
> needed... (Note: implementation wouldn't be hard at all)
>
>
> When you format this code (e.g using Ctrl+D) the result is a very ugly
> syntax:
>
> var
> S: string;
> B: Boolen = True;
> begin
> S :=
> if B then
> 'A'
> else
> 'B';
> end;
>
> And I think that it breaks compatibility with many Pascal syntax
> beautifier. IMHO Iif() (or something like this) sounds better.
I honestly don't care about syntax beautifiers, like at all. Most are
already broken for ObjFPC anyway.
Regards,
Sven
More information about the fpc-pascal
mailing list