[fpc-pascal] A better way?
tony.whyman at mccallumwhyman.com
Fri Apr 15 12:13:36 CEST 2016
On 15/04/16 10:00, Ryan Joseph wrote:
> So, a common scenario is a member variable being declared as TObject then having to typecast it every time I need to access one of it’s methods. Declaring another variable in each function instead of typecasting is perhaps more work but maybe I’m not getting it.
Here's an update of my previous example. In this example, "absolute" is
just a way of tidying up the code when you need to make multiple
references to a variable that always has to have its type coerced.
In the end though this is just a "what's in a name? A rose by any other
name would smell as sweet" debate. No matter how you approach the
problem, you have to have an identifier for the other class when you
reference its methods and properties. If you don't want to declare two
mutually referential classes in the same unit, then one of them (but
only one) has to use some technique to avoid circular references. Type
casting is a simple technique and you either have to coerce each use
(think of TClassB(FObject) as just being a longer name for the same
thing) or declare an alias of the correct type - a "With" statement can
also be your friend here.
It's not that big an overhead and when it comes to type casts a 'C'
programmer would wonder what all the fuss was about.
var aClassBObject: TClassB absolute FClassBObject;
More information about the fpc-pascal