[fpc-pascal] Boring problem when I try to create a database using SQLdb (again)

silvioprog silvioprog at gmail.com
Mon May 18 18:09:11 CEST 2015


On Sat, May 16, 2015 at 2:19 PM, silvioprog <silvioprog at gmail.com> wrote:

> On Sat, May 16, 2015 at 1:51 PM, Michael Van Canneyt <
> michael at freepascal.org> wrote:
>>
>> On Sat, 16 May 2015, silvioprog wrote:
>>
>>> [...]
>>>
>> Set the stoUseImplicit option on the transaction:
>>
>> VCon.Transaction.options:=[stoUseImplicit]
>
>
> Thanks for the fast reply buddy.
>
> I have another problem: my FPC version is 2.6.4, and this option is not
> available in this version. =/
>
> But just to test, I did it using FPC from trunk, and the following code
> returned another error:
>
> [code]
> var
>   VCon: TPQConnection;
> begin
>   VCon := TPQConnection.Create(nil);
>   VCon.Transaction := TSQLTransaction.Create(VCon);
>   try
>     VCon.Transaction.Options := VCon.Transaction.Options +
> [stoUseImplicit];
>     VCon.HostName := '127.0.0.1';
>     VCon.DatabaseName := 'postgres';
>     VCon.UserName := 'postgres';
>     VCon.Password := 'postgres';
>     VCon.ExecuteDirect(
>       'CREATE DATABASE "09_0025" WITH ENCODING=''UTF8'' ' +
>       '  OWNER="postgres" TEMPLATE="template1" ' +
>       '  LC_COLLATE=''English_United States.1252'' ' +
>       '  LC_CTYPE=''English_United States.1252'' '+
>       '  CONNECTION LIMIT=-1 TABLESPACE="pg_default"');
>   finally
>     VCon.Free;
>   end;
> end;
> [/code]
>
> Error:
>
> #0 PQCONNECTION$_$TPQTRANS_$__$$_REGISTERCURSOR$TPQCURSOR at :0
> #1
> PQCONNECTION$_$TPQCONNECTION_$__$$_EXECUTE$TSQLCURSOR$TSQLTRANSACTION$TPARAMS
> at :0
> #2 SQLDB$_$TSQLCONNECTION_$__$$_EXECUTEDIRECT$ANSISTRING$TSQLTRANSACTION
> at :0
> #3 SQLDB$_$TSQLCONNECTION_$__$$_EXECUTEDIRECT$ANSISTRING at :0
> #4 TFORM1__BUTTON1CLICK(0x1dc248, <error reading variable>) at Unit1.pas:45
> ...
>
>
>> Why methods like "ExecuteDirectPG", "CheckConnectionStatus",
>>> "CheckResultError", "TranslateFldType" and "GetExtendedFieldInfo" are not
>>> declared as protected methods?
>>>
>>
>> No particular reason. That can be changed.
>>
>> Michael.
>
>
> Very nice. I can create a patch to move this methods to the protected
> area. =)
>

Done:

http://bugs.freepascal.org/view.php?id=28125

-- 
Silvio Cl├ęcio
My public projects - github.com/silvioprog
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.freepascal.org/pipermail/fpc-pascal/attachments/20150518/99a7e43d/attachment.html>


More information about the fpc-pascal mailing list