[fpc-pascal] the unexplained 666
nc-gaertnma at netcologne.de
Sun Mar 1 16:29:31 CET 2015
On Sun, 1 Mar 2015 16:11:06 +0100 (CET)
marcov at stack.nl (Marco van de Voort) wrote:
> In our previous episode, Mattias Gaertner said:
> > Why not write &666? Maybe some religious reasons? ;)
> No, simply that octal literal support is newer than the *nix rtl.
ok, although then again: When came binary and hexadecimal?
> If you want to work on this, please fix the constants in the FreeBSD console
> unit too, there are another couple of hundred such cases there :-)
My main concern was the lack of comments/documentation.
More information about the fpc-pascal