[fpc-pascal] [PATCH] Add the CreateCGIParams/FreeCGIParams methods in FCL FCGI

[silvioprog]

On Fri, Jan 30, 2015 at 4:39 AM, Michael Van Canneyt <michael at freepascal.org
> wrote:
>
> On Thu, 29 Jan 2015, silvioprog wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Jan 29, 2015 at 7:26 PM, Michael Van Canneyt <
>> michael at freepascal.org> wrote:
>>       On Thu, 29 Jan 2015, silvioprog wrote:
>>
>>             Hello,
>>
>>             Please see this patch in attached. Can I send it to
>> bugtracker?
>>
>>
>>       I don't see the point. Why do you need this ?
>>
>>
>> Yes, after a while I saw that my patch seems redundant. But please notice
>> this code below:
>>
>> function TFCGIRequest.ProcessFCGIRecord(AFCGIRecord: PFCGI_Header):
>> boolean;
>> ...
>>                         else
>>                           begin
>>                           if not assigned(FCGIParams) then
>>                             FCGIParams := TStringList.Create;
>>                           GetNameValuePairsFromContentRe
>> cord(PFCGI_ContentRecord(AFCGIRecord),FCGIParams);
>>                           end;
>>
>> It seems to offer the programmer to create an own cgiparams. Is this "if"
>> just to create this field when the request need to use it?
>>
>
> Yes. I usually prefer late allocation on an as-needed basis.


Me too. =)


> What do you think about to create the FCGIParams field in the create of
>> the TFCGIRequest class and remove the "if" from the
>> ProcessFCGIRecord method?
>>
>> I think that the ProcessFCGIRecord method is more triggered than the
>> constructor of the TFCGIRequest class.
>>
>
> ProcessFCGIRecord is usually called only once or maybe twice if there are
> really a lot of parameters.
> So I seriously doubt it will make a noticeable difference in speed :)
>

Hehe indeed. Keep it as is. =)

-- 
Silvio Clécio
My public projects - github.com/silvioprog
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.freepascal.org/pipermail/fpc-pascal/attachments/20150130/8e78d488/attachment.html>