[fpc-pascal] TThread.Queue vs TThread.Synchronize

[silvioprog]

On Mon, Feb 23, 2015 at 4:24 PM, Philippe Lévi <Philippe at quarta.com.br>
wrote:

> may be I do not catch it well ... problem with my english understan ...
> may be. "we'll get" ... you mean some day it should be possible to program
> it? .... correct?
>
> you mean it will be possible to use a pointer to local function in a call?
>
> or I misunderstand ...
>
> ________________________________________
> De: fpc-pascal-bounces at lists.freepascal.org <
> fpc-pascal-bounces at lists.freepascal.org> em nome de Sven Barth <
> pascaldragon at googlemail.com>
> Enviado: segunda-feira, 23 de fevereiro de 2015 16:17
> Para: fpc-pascal at lists.freepascal.org
> Assunto: Re: [fpc-pascal] TThread.Queue vs TThread.Synchronize
>
> On 23.02.2015 19:41, Philippe Lévi wrote:
> > I "thought" it was not possible to use local procedure address as
> parameter like in queue( @SyncOnPrint);
> > as Clecio showed ...
>
> Please read the following part of my message again:
>
> >
> > For FPC modes and those people that dislike the syntax of anonymous
> functions (and yes, I can understand those people ) I hope that we'll get
> the following variation to work as well:
>
> Regards,
> Sven
>

Oops, sorry. Just confusion on translation.

you mean it will be possible to use a pointer to local function in a call? ²

(some switch to enable this feature?)

-- 
Silvio Clécio
My public projects - github.com/silvioprog
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.freepascal.org/pipermail/fpc-pascal/attachments/20150223/6b4526d5/attachment.html>