[fpc-pascal] Is TFPList thread safe?
Michael Schnell
mschnell at lumino.de
Mon Oct 6 11:46:49 CEST 2014
On 10/02/2014 05:03 PM, Xiangrong Fang wrote:
>
>
>
> For Windows, critical sections are lighter-weight than mutexes.
> Mutexes can be shared between processes, but always result in a
> system call to the kernel which has some overhead. Critical
> sections can only be used within one process, but have the
> advantage that they only switch to kernel mode in the case of
> contention.
>
>
> I only need lock WITHIN my own application, so, it seems that critical
> sections are better.
>
So it seems that Windows in fact does a kind of FUTEX for inter-Thread
synchronizing (as does pthredlib, that as it's name says just provides
POSIX-operation within Threads, not between applications.)
Hence, provided TCrtiticalSections uses the Windows system DLL in
Windows and the pthreadlib so in Linux, the resulting performance
should be very similar.
-Michael
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.freepascal.org/pipermail/fpc-pascal/attachments/20141006/7352dc45/attachment.html>
More information about the fpc-pascal
mailing list