[fpc-pascal] Dynamic arrays, yet another pitfall

[Martin Frb]

On 17/02/2014 17:28, Jürgen Hestermann wrote:
> Am 2014-02-17 18:01, schrieb Martin Frb:
> > On 17/02/2014 16:40, Jürgen Hestermann wrote:
> > It appears, that the copy-on-setlength is intended. So in that the 
> documentation is right.
>
> It is intended but is was not mentioned in the documentation.
> Therefore this whole thread exists at all.

Then why does this discussion continue, now that it is documented?

Does it matter what other people consider a write and what not? (Unless 
that part made it into the docs, but there was no mention it did)?