[fpc-pascal] Re: StrUtils.RomanToInt oddities

[Reinier Olislagers]

On 24/09/2013 14:25, Marco van de Voort wrote:
> In our previous episode, Reinier Olislagers said:
<snip>
>>> Because that has an use. The internal FPC compatability, specially in
>>> the more fringe areas like this, service no use than fattening maillist
>>> archives IMHO.
>>
>> If you don't see a use for backward compatibility for existing code...
> 
> I see it only as an starting point, not as a rigid unbendable rule.
> _

There is just *no* way the second and the first statements can possibly
match.
Furthermore you ignore any nuanced response I post and just repeat some
point you stated earlier.
Yes, I suppose it's an exchange of views but it is not useful at all.