[fpc-pascal] [OT] sealed?

Paul Ishenin paul.ishenin at gmail.com
Tue Oct 8 13:06:27 CEST 2013

08.10.2013 17:35, Graeme Geldenhuys пишет:
> All good and well, but I really don't see the point of a class that you
> can't extend. The original developer can never foresee all possible use
> cases in the future. We already have issues with some classes defining
> fields or methods and private, when they would have been better suited
> as protected. Sealed classes are just going to make matters worse. It
> defeats the whole purpose of OOP.

Just open the old mail thread - the question was discussed there with 
your participation (as I remember). There is no need to repeat it again.

Best regards,
Paul Ishenin

More information about the fpc-pascal mailing list