[fpc-pascal] Amazon S3

[Marcos Douglas]

On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 1:39 PM, silvioprog <silvioprog at gmail.com> wrote:
> 2013/3/21 Marcos Douglas <md at delfire.net>
>>
>> On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 12:30 PM, silvioprog <silvioprog at gmail.com> wrote:
>> > 2013/3/21 Sven Barth <pascaldragon at googlemail.com>
>> >>
>> >> Am 20.03.2013 09:18, schrieb Michael Schnell:
>> >>
>> >>> Of course Android is a rather hot topic in the fpc and Lazarus
>> >>> developer's forums. There are pages in the fpc / Lazarus Wiki on
>> >>> Android.
>> >>
>> >> Ehm... you do know that "Amazon S3" <> "Samsung Galaxy S3"? Amazon S3
>> >> is
>> >> the cloud storage solution by Amazon. See also:
>> >> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Amazon_S3
>> >>
>> >> Regards,
>> >> Sven
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > There are plans to implement this feature in Brook, but I'm out of time
>> > to
>> > complete it. But I already sent and receive files to Amazon, in my
>> > drafts
>> > (in pure FPC). I remember being shown some print screens for Marcos via
>> > GTalk.
>> >
>> > I've been wondering if this would be a closed source plugin, and out of
>> > Brook. I thought about closing it not because I want to don't show the
>> > sources, but simply for my concurrent (http://www.habarisoft.com) does
>> > not
>> > copy it easily.
>> >
>> > I could implement it smoothly on a weekend, but there's another problem,
>> > I
>> > need to finish another project I'm doing, because my time is running out
>> > to
>> > pay my bills hehehe...
>>
>> As I said to you, I can help to codify this part... but you didn't
>> answer my last question (link #14) and now you talk about "closed
>> source".
>> If you has some code and it works and you want to put this in Brook's
>> sources, I can help you. But if you stay thinking "closed source",
>> please tell now.
>> I keep wondering If you keep thinking it is more worthwhile closed
>> source or open...  please tell us so I can be move on.
>>
>> Thank you.
>>
>> Marcos Douglas
>
>
> I'll not give the answer now because I have not decided yet (if it will be
> closed, free or open source). I don't wanna rush things. And nothing
> prevents you from continuing.

Ok, thank you for explanation... now.

> It's not pleasant you spend hours and hours implementing a new feature, and
> your concurrent copy it easily to his project and not give the credits to
> the author. I want to avoid it as much as possible.

Ok.

>
> Sorry for my english please.

That is Ok for me.

Best regards,
Marcos Douglas