reinierolislagers at gmail.com
Wed Jun 5 07:37:07 CEST 2013
On 4-6-2013 20:05, Florian Klaempfl wrote:
> Am 29.05.2013 06:25, schrieb Reinier Olislagers:
>> On 28-5-2013 19:16, Sven Barth wrote:
>>> On 28.05.2013 17:41, Reinier Olislagers wrote:
>>>> Going by the discussions on this mailing list I'm having trouble
>>>> believing LLVM backend support would be in the plans. Should this line
>>>> perhaps be removed.
>>> Where in the discussions did we mention that we do not want a LLVM
>> Florian saying he didn't want an LLVM backend.
> Actually, I meant/said I'am not interested in working on one. For me the
> backend work is the interesting work, everything else is just boring
> duty :)
That's understandable - so to clarify: you're not opposed to an LLVM
backend, you're just not going to write one yourself, right?
More information about the fpc-pascal