[fpc-pascal] Re: State of fcl-stl generics lib
florian at freepascal.org
Sun Jan 20 15:03:45 CET 2013
Am 20.01.2013 14:25, schrieb Marco van de Voort:
> In our previous episode, Michael Van Canneyt said:
>>>> No, but adding things from time to time shows it is not dead code :-)
>>> Indeed, but the additions should follow a common goal and as far as I
>>> understood, fcl-stl shall provide opaque containers which is not the
>>> case for a tree implementation.
>> ? Why not ? I see no difference with a list or collection ?
> I didn't get the problem either.
> I do see another redudancy. gset already has a red-black implementation.
> (even if it is called a set)
Yes, STL is about usage patterns (like any good container library) but
not about implementation.
More information about the fpc-pascal