[fpc-pascal] Re: State of fcl-stl generics lib
florian at freepascal.org
Sun Jan 20 14:30:17 CET 2013
Am 20.01.2013 14:22, schrieb Michael Van Canneyt:
> On Sun, 20 Jan 2013, Florian Klämpfl wrote:
>> Am 20.01.2013 11:15, schrieb Michael Van Canneyt:
>>> On Sun, 20 Jan 2013, Florian Klämpfl wrote:
>>>> Am 20.01.2013 06:17, schrieb leledumbo:
>>>>> No one seems to see: http://bugs.freepascal.org/view.php?id=23654 :(
>>>> Well, it's a new feature: just slapping another piece of code into
>>>> fpc-stl not improving existing stuff.
>>> No, but adding things from time to time shows it is not dead code :-)
>> Indeed, but the additions should follow a common goal and as far as I
>> understood, fcl-stl shall provide opaque containers which is not the
>> case for a tree implementation.
> ? Why not ? I see no difference with a list or collection ?
A tree is something implementation specific while the fpc-stl is only
about opaque data structures. E.g. the fpc-stl supports TSet: but the
whole implementation is hidden. The user does not/need not to know how
the set works internally. It could be a linked list, a tree, whatever.
More information about the fpc-pascal