[fpc-pascal] Re: State of fcl-stl generics lib
Marco van de Voort
marcov at stack.nl
Sun Jan 20 14:25:41 CET 2013
In our previous episode, Michael Van Canneyt said:
> >> No, but adding things from time to time shows it is not dead code :-)
> > Indeed, but the additions should follow a common goal and as far as I
> > understood, fcl-stl shall provide opaque containers which is not the
> > case for a tree implementation.
> ? Why not ? I see no difference with a list or collection ?
I didn't get the problem either.
I do see another redudancy. gset already has a red-black implementation.
(even if it is called a set)
More information about the fpc-pascal