[fpc-pascal] Subject: Re: 2.6.0 for Solaris? And other questions
microcode at zoho.com
microcode at zoho.com
Wed May 9 18:26:04 CEST 2012
From: "Tomas Hajny"
>> Do you guys plan on releasing the 2.6.0 version on Solaris and is there
>> a timeframe? Do you plan on continuing to support Solaris? I would be
>> interested in running both the Intel and SPARC versions if they come
> I'm not the right one to answer this question but I believe that this
> depends mainly on availability of a maintainer for this operating system.
> You may try building the compiler (and RTL) for that platform and it may
> work well for you, but you may encounter some issues.
I didn't find a list of maintainers on the home page and I don't know how
Free Pascal development is organized. Hopefully the maintainer will speak up
and in the meantime I will look at the build guide you mentioned further
>> Another question is on 2.6.0 on Linux. I cannot run the fp ide because I
>> have glibc 2.9. The error message I get says
>> fp: /lib64/libc.so.6: version `GLIBC_2.14' not found (required by fp)
>> That is really a recent version! Even the latest Slackware from 1 year
>> ago only has glibc 2.13. Is this really needed or can it be built against
>> my version of glibc?
> It should be possible to build against your version of glibc, but you'll
> probably have to do it yourself (or use FPC binaries provided by your
There are no binaries provided by my distribution. It's Slackware! But the
question was, was it really necessary to use such a recent glibc?
> Search for 'buildfaq.pdf' in order to learn more on how to build FPC
> yourself. Make sure to also have libgdb available in the right place in
> order to have debugging support available in the fp ide (e.g. by using
> one of precompiled versions available in the "contrib" section of our FTP
>> I have various other stuff going wrong when trying to build some of the
>> samples like the fpc compiler not being able to find certain libraries.
>> Should I post the error messages here or should I look for a bug tracker?
> This depends on what the 'certain libraries' are. If you try to compile
> samples linking to external (3rd party) libraries, this is no fpc bug -
> you need to make sure to have development packages of the respective 3rd
> party libraries installed using tools appropriate for your distribution
I believe they are fpc libraries but I will have to check again. Do you
expect that all of the examples will normally build on Linux without errors
or is it normal to have some problems?
More information about the fpc-pascal