[fpc-pascal] Should FCL documentation be splitted?

[michael.vancanneyt at wisa.be]

On Thu, 5 Jul 2012, leledumbo wrote:

> I would like to document some of the FCL, however the layout is still like
> the first time it appears in FPC. Current FCL are splitted into many
> subpackages, and since the number of units is HUGE (which I guess the same
> reason why the package was splitted) would it be better to split the
> documentation as well?

No, it's better to keep it together:
1. to have an overview of what is available.
2. cross-referencing across packages in documentation is not easy.

Michael.