[fpc-pascal] Custom operators for non-record types

JC Chu jcchu at acm.org
Tue Jul 3 02:49:36 CEST 2012

Yes.  I made that error in my first patch.  The new compiler wasn’t
even able to compile itself…

I think someone should start making a complete chart for acceptance
and rejection rules.

On Mon, Jul 2, 2012 at 10:51 PM, Jonas Maebe <jonas.maebe at elis.ugent.be> wrote:
> Going to a situation where overloading is allowed by default is not good.
> It's too easy to miss something (because there is no formal specification of
> the language anywhere), and then in subsequent releases you may have to have
> to break existing code because you have to disable certain overloads again.

Best regards,
JC Chu

More information about the fpc-pascal mailing list