[fpc-pascal] Re: Access violation that I do not understand while creating a class instance
ik
idokan at gmail.com
Mon Jan 23 16:38:48 CET 2012
On Mon, Jan 23, 2012 at 17:10, Henry Vermaak <henry.vermaak at gmail.com>wrote:
> On 23/01/12 14:56, ik wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Jan 23, 2012 at 16:28, ik <idokan at gmail.com
>> <mailto:idokan at gmail.com>> wrote:
>>
>> Hello,
>>
>> In the following code
>> (https://github.com/ik5/redit_**client.fpc/blob/master/tests/**
>> test_parser.lpr#L55<https://github.com/ik5/redit_client.fpc/blob/master/tests/test_parser.lpr#L55>
>> ),
>>
>> when I point, I have access violation when trying to create
>> TRedisErrorReturnType.Create
>>
>> It does not happen for TRedisStatusReturnType.Create for example,
>> that have the same parent as TRedisErrorReturnType.
>>
>> What am I missing or doing wrong here ?
>>
>>
>> Solved it, but I do not understand it.
>> Why did new made access violation and StrAlloc not ?
>>
>
> Because new() just allocated one pchar and not a buffer. Why do you think
> using a pchar like this is faster than using string? Have you benchmarked
> it?
>
I haven't benchmark anything in my life :)
PChar is an array like approach. AnsiString, is a record based pointer. It
uses more memory, and provide a bit overhead for the same thing.
At least on theory. I would love to learn that it's not the case.
Thanks
>
> Henry
> ______________________________**_________________
> fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal at lists.freepascal.**org<fpc-pascal at lists.freepascal.org>
> http://lists.freepascal.org/**mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal<http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal>
>
Ido
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.freepascal.org/pipermail/fpc-pascal/attachments/20120123/ac775784/attachment.html>
More information about the fpc-pascal
mailing list