[fpc-pascal] some new features to delphi prisem
Marco van de Voort
marcov at stack.nl
Mon Feb 22 15:01:34 CET 2010
In our previous episode, Matt Emson said:
> Marco van de Voort wrote:
> > IMHO Prism is not even Delphi. Just recycling of the brand.
>
> Laying cards on the proverbial table, I don't think it was ever intended
> to be Delphi. RemObjects developed the compiler completely outside of
> Delphi for a number of years before the technology was licensed to
> become Prism. Fact. IIRC, they billed "Chrome" (then Oxygen) as a
> Pascal-like syntax refined for the .Net framework. It was the
> Codegear/Embarcadero licensing that first created Delphi Prism.
Correct.
> The syntax that Prism uses is a lot cleaner in many respects -
> especially removing the "procedure"/"function" conundrum and using
> instead "method". However, in other ways it is horrible and so I can
> also see why it is not something worth discussing further.
Good. I just want to add that not every improvement (even if a real
consensus exists that it is better) is worth breaking compatibility for.
More information about the fpc-pascal
mailing list