[fpc-pascal] fpGUI powered by OpenGL
henry.vermaak at gmail.com
Mon Dec 20 16:15:02 CET 2010
On 20 December 2010 14:57, Vincent Snijders <vincent.snijders at gmail.com> wrote:
> 2010/12/20 <dhkblaszyk at zeelandnet.nl>:
>>> But why is it not possible to integrate this with the regular fpGUI ?
>>> Can you explain in a couple of sentences ?
>> Can't remember having said that it was impossible with the current approach.
>> In fact it is perfectly doable. However (free)glut and opengl are already
>> available on a large number of platforms/targets. So if fpGUI is built upon
>> these libs then you immediately take the benefit of being able to support
>> these platforms. Additionally you don't have to implement a "complex"
>> interface between the different platforms this is handled already by glut
>> and opengl for you. So in effect it could make fpGUI simpler. And the last
>> plus is having a hardware accelerated gui. It just means it's lightning fast
>> and that's a plus for UI's.
>> Thats not all however, there are minusses. By using glut, you limit yourself
>> to the supported platforms/targets. So if new platforms/targets come along
>> then there is no way (unless you supply patches to the project) to add them.
>> With the current approach you're free to do it yourself. Also the API is
>> plain rigid. This means you'll have to adapt to that and live with it
>> (notice it's a plus and minus depending on how you look at it). (That is why
>> I would like to see a fpGlut some day ;) and believe me it will come to that
>> I probably forgot a few plusses and minusses, but that's about it as far as
>> I'm concerned. Also I don't mean to say that using an opengl/glut backend is
>> superior to the current ones. It just has other benefits I suppose.
> The above explains why it is useful for an application developer to
> use an openGL backend.
> It does not explain the following: Since fpGUI already has two
> backends (afaik, X and winap), why can't openGL a third one? Did you
> change the way fpGUI interfaces with its backend? Is this change so
> incompatible with the current backends, that they cannot be modified?
I'm sure Graeme would be very interested to provide guidance, too. Is
he still subscribed to this list?
More information about the fpc-pascal