[fpc-pascal] The names of the various FPC documentation
Marco van de Voort
marcov at stack.nl
Mon Sep 7 09:02:15 CEST 2009
In our previous episode, Graeme Geldenhuys said:
> Out of those 3 seems to have logical names. rtl, fcl and fpdoc. The
> problem I have is the 'user', 'ref' and 'prog' names. Maybe somebody
> can explain to me how I can remember the various information in each of
> these. For example, if I want to know about a Compiler Parameter, or a
> Language syntax, it is never clear which document I should open.
> Now seeing that all (half-descent) OSes support long filenames these
> days, couldn't we name them better.
The names would then be out of sync with the forms of documentation
supported on apparantly less than half-decent OSes. (like CHM)
Moreover I don't have a problem with the names themselves. One could wonder
about the division of the three, but the association of "ref" with
"reference guide", prog with "programmers's guide" etc isn't THAT hard.
More information about the fpc-pascal