[fpc-pascal] FPC_ARMEL system calls

[Florian Klaempfl]

Luca Olivetti schrieb:
> En/na Luca Olivetti ha escrit:
>> En/na Florian Klaempfl ha escrit:
>>
>>>>
>>>> grepping for abi_eabi I found that the different syscall convention 
>>>> is in rtl/linux/arm/syscall.inc, but it is conditioned to 
>>>> FPC_ABI_EABI, not to FPC_ARMEL, so in order to have a fully eabi 
>>>> compliant compiler should I use "-dFPC_ARMEL -dFPC_ABI_EABI"?
>>>
>>> The changed abi field in the system info record causes FPC_ABI_EABI 
>>> being defined. Same for softfloat. -dFPC_ARMEL should be enough and 
>>> triggering everything else.
>>
>> I forced -dFPC_ABI_EABI and the generated ppc1 gives an "qemu: 
>> uncaught target signal 6" (under scratchbox/qemu) or segfaults under 
>> real hardware.
> 
> nevermind, I found where FPC_ABI is defined in compiler/options.pas.
> However, if I omit the "-CfSOFT" while building the compiler I get this:
> 
> /home/luca/fpc-svn/rtl/units/arm-linux/system.s: Assembler messages:
> /home/luca/fpc-svn/rtl/units/arm-linux/system.s:18046: Error: selected 
> processor does not support `rfs r0'
> /home/luca/fpc-svn/rtl/units/arm-linux/system.s:18049: Error: selected 
> processor does not support `wfs r0'
> /home/luca/fpc-svn/rtl/units/arm-linux/system.s:23962: Error: selected 
> processor does not support `stfd f0,[r11,#-56]'
> /home/luca/fpc-svn/rtl/units/arm-linux/system.s:23963: Error: selected 
> processor does not support `ldfd f0,[r11,#-56]'
> 

But you used OPT=-dFPC_ARMEL?