[fpc-pascal] fpnanosleep (again)

Micha Nelissen micha at neli.hopto.org
Thu Nov 8 19:20:46 CET 2007

John Coppens wrote:
> Just an extra note: delay(1) seems to delay 4.1 ms, so it _does_ seem to
> be possible to do less than 8.3?

You wait till the next tick that is after the requested delay. So it's
never a HZ multiple or so.


More information about the fpc-pascal mailing list