[fpc-pascal] CheckSynchronize

Felipe Monteiro de Carvalho felipemonteiro.carvalho at gmail.com
Fri Jun 22 10:04:09 CEST 2007

On 6/22/07, Vincent Snijders <vsnijders at quicknet.nl> wrote:
> It is not that we can't use the release, but we (at least I) rather risk a possible instability rather than have some some known bugs and limitations. And that I want to invest time in it by distributing patched versions of fpc. I think this is similar to why there is debian for people who value stability and ubuntu for people who want faster bug fixes or new features.

Are the bugs really that severe that people can't wait for 2.2.2?

I think that maintaining such separate branch isn't a good idea. If
the fixes haven't been commited because they can have unprevisible
side effects, releasing Lazarus with them may just as well
fix a bug for some users, but add new bugs for lot's of other people,
and then make this Lazarus release unusable for lot's of people.

Felipe Monteiro de Carvalho

More information about the fpc-pascal mailing list