[fpc-pascal] Re: put data to stdout (fpc vs. gcc)
Jonas Maebe
jonas.maebe at elis.ugent.be
Fri Jun 15 11:39:45 CEST 2007
On 15 jun 2007, at 11:24, fpc at xgelb.de wrote:
> Hi Jonas,
>
>>> I know, programs with a writeln() have lower performance, but
>>> I think, printf() and writeln() must do the same. This need time
>>> to calculate.
>>> But the difference between printf() and writeln() are so,
>>> that the fpc program breaks with errors.
>
>> What kind of errors?
>
> It will break with an error from the library, if the procedure is
> to slow.
I'm sorry, but you are not providing enough information to give any
useful comments. There is no reason why a generic library would error
out because certain code is "too slow". Is this a real time
application on an embedded system or so?
> Do you know a better way to produce a fast formated output in
> FreePascal.
> I would use FreePascal and not gcc, but the fpc result is not
> practical.
If your program depends on converting floating point numbers to
string representation as quickly as possible, I agree that FPC is not
the tool you want in this case.
Jonas
More information about the fpc-pascal
mailing list