[fpc-pascal] Documentation for sqldb - More Questions
Michael Van Canneyt
michael at freepascal.org
Tue Jul 3 14:34:42 CEST 2007
On Tue, 3 Jul 2007, Martin Schreiber wrote:
> On Tuesday 03 July 2007 12.57, Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
> > I'd rather see that the whole is coordinated a bit. I don't think all this
> > duplication is a good idea; One solid set of components makes much more
> > sense: the number of developers available for it's maintenance would
> > double. The end user would also benefit, as we can give 1 solid set of
> > components, no doubts possible.
> > There are not so many people available who understand the inner workings
> > of TDataset and friends, so all this scattering and dividing is
> > counterproductive.
> > It would be much better if you, me, Joost and Bram (who work on SQLDB)
> > had a single set of components to work with: speed would not be an issue
> > then, and we could guarantee a working and reliable set of components for
> > everyone.
> You are right, I will think about your offer. :-)
That's good, thank you :-)
> Michael, Joost and Bram please look into my code, can you imagine to merge
> with FCL?
> The relevant files are in
Checking out now.
I'll consult with Joost and Bram separately. I am a bit worried about the widestring
issue. While good for msegui which uses widestrings internally, it's also slower and
more memory consuming. A fixed buffer has it's advantages. The change-log handling
and indexes are a Good Thing (tm), and I remarked on that some time ago already :-)
We'll see. Let me consult, and then I'll get back to you.
More information about the fpc-pascal