[fpc-pascal] Problems with generics

bartek bbartek at gmx.net
Sun Dec 30 20:25:35 CET 2007

On Sunday 30 December 2007 15:31:32 Micha Nelissen wrote:
> bartek wrote:
> > I am not quite sure whether my synatx is correct. IMHO explictly defining 
> > type feels more pascalish. Having more time at hand i have written a much 
> > shorter example code which shows in what way such a type should be 
> I think that it is the same type in a different namespace. Like using
> "unit.type" syntax.
> Micha
> _______________________________________________
> fpc-pascal maillist  -  fpc-pascal at lists.freepascal.org
> http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal

Yes you are right, I did not think of that. I think a seperate bugreport is 
appropriate, since this bug is not even really related to the previous bug.
The last one made the 2.2.0 compiler crash, this one is a missing feature in 
the svn trunk.

Reported as #0010512 with unit.type/(generic)class.type as expected behaviour.


More information about the fpc-pascal mailing list