Jonas Maebe schreef: > Hello, > > sets in FPC on big endian machines. The reason is that this would be > necessary to allow byte-packing of sets (so that e.g. a set of 0..63 > would only occupy 1 byte as opposed to 4 like is currently the case). A set of 0..63 requires 64 bits, doesn't it? So it would need 8 bytes, or am I mistaken? Vincent