[fpc-pascal] fpcdoc gives a lot of warnings

[Michael Van Canneyt]

On Wed, 13 Dec 2006, Vincent Snijders wrote:

> Hi,
> 
> If I use thhe fpc 2.1.1 version of fpdoc on the rtl documentation files, I get
> a lot of warnings like:
> 
> Writing 7520 pages...
> [<no context>] Invalid description (illegal XML element: "#text")
> [<no context>] Invalid description (illegal XML element: "#text")
> [<no context>] Invalid description (illegal XML element: "#text")
> [<no context>] Invalid description (illegal XML element: "#text")
> [<no context>] Invalid description (illegal XML element: "#text")
> [<no context>] Invalid description (illegal XML element: "#text")
> [#rtl.strutils.AnsiMatchText] Invalid description (illegal XML element:
> "#text")
> [#rtl.strutils.AnsiMatchText] Invalid description (illegal XML element:
> "#text")
> [#rtl.strutils.AnsiMatchText] Invalid description (illegal XML element:
> "#text")
> [#rtl.strutils.AnsiMatchStr] Invalid description (illegal XML element:
> "#text")
> [#rtl.strutils.AnsiMatchStr] Invalid description (illegal XML element:
> "#text")
> [#rtl.strutils.AnsiMatchStr] Invalid description (illegal XML element:
> "#text")
> 
> Do you have an idea, what causes this? Is the new parser adding #text nodes,
> that the old parser didn't? Is fpdoc's checking too strict?

Hm. I don't know. looking at strutils.xml, I think it is a whitespace issue:
I assume it thinks there is too much whitespace between <descr> and the 
starting <p> tag. I'll have to check this.

Michael.