[fpc-pascal] kol/compactutils: was - another fpc RAD: MSEide
fpc505 at z505.com
Thu Apr 20 00:45:59 CEST 2006
> It's always a trade off. Neither KOL nor FCL is better, they are simply
> designed different and comparsion is useless.
The intention is purely to be compact, and I didn't mean to compare or compete with FCL.
I was just mentioning that those who need a convenient compact StringList without the
bloat of 60-70K being hauled in compactutils is there for you. Free for your usage.
p.s. There is err.pas for KOL exception handling. Adds a few kilobytes. Still not
comparable to FCL exception handling probably. But that's not the intention at all. The
intention is purely to be compact, not to compete with classes.pp.
More information about the fpc-pascal